Added to the repository

+/* Copyright (C) 2001, 2002, 2003 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
+   Written by Bruno Haible <haible@clisp.cons.org>, 2001.
+
+   This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
+   it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
+   the Free Software Foundation; either version 2, or (at your option)
+   any later version.
+
+   This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
+   but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+   MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
+   GNU General Public License for more details.
+
+   You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
+   along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software Foundation,
+   Inc., 59 Temple Place - Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307, USA.  */
+
+#ifndef _STDBOOL_H
+#define _STDBOOL_H
+
+/* ISO C 99 <stdbool.h> for platforms that lack it.  */
+
+/* Usage suggestions:
+
+   Programs that use <stdbool.h> should be aware of some limitations
+   and standards compliance issues.
+
+   Standards compliance:
+
+       - <stdbool.h> must be #included before 'bool', 'false', 'true'
+         can be used.
+
+       - You cannot assume that sizeof (bool) == 1.
+
+       - Programs should not undefine the macros bool, true, and false,
+         as C99 lists that as an "obsolescent feature".
+
+   Limitations of this substitute, when used in a C89 environment:
+
+       - <stdbool.h> must be #included before the '_Bool' type can be used.
+
+       - You cannot assume that _Bool is a typedef; it might be a macro.
+
+       - In C99, casts and automatic conversions to '_Bool' or 'bool' are
+         performed in such a way that every nonzero value gets converted
+         to 'true', and zero gets converted to 'false'.  This doesn't work
+         with this substitute.  With this substitute, only the values 0 and 1
+         give the expected result when converted to _Bool' or 'bool'.
+
+   Also, it is suggested that programs use 'bool' rather than '_Bool';
+   this isn't required, but 'bool' is more common.  */
+
+
+/* 7.16. Boolean type and values */
+
+/* BeOS <sys/socket.h> already #defines false 0, true 1.  We use the same
+   definitions below, but temporarily we have to #undef them.  */
+#ifdef __BEOS__
+# include <OS.h> /* defines bool but not _Bool */
+# undef false
+# undef true
+#endif
+
+/* For the sake of symbolic names in gdb, we define true and false as
+   enum constants, not only as macros.
+   It is tempting to write
+      typedef enum { false = 0, true = 1 } _Bool;
+   so that gdb prints values of type 'bool' symbolically. But if we do
+   this, values of type '_Bool' may promote to 'int' or 'unsigned int'
+   (see ISO C 99 6.7.2.2.(4)); however, '_Bool' must promote to 'int'
+   (see ISO C 99 6.3.1.1.(2)).  So we add a negative value to the
+   enum; this ensures that '_Bool' promotes to 'int'.  */
+#if !(defined __cplusplus || defined __BEOS__)
+# if !0
+#  if defined __SUNPRO_C && (__SUNPRO_C < 0x550 || __STDC__ == 1)
+    /* Avoid stupid "warning: _Bool is a keyword in ISO C99".  */
+#   define _Bool signed char
+enum { false = 0, true = 1 };
+#  else
+typedef enum { _Bool_must_promote_to_int = -1, false = 0, true = 1 } _Bool;
+#  endif
+# endif
+#else
+typedef bool _Bool;
+#endif
+#define bool _Bool
+
+/* The other macros must be usable in preprocessor directives.  */
+#define false 0
+#define true 1
+#define __bool_true_false_are_defined 1
+
+#endif /* _STDBOOL_H */

+# unlocked-io.m4 serial 11
+
+# Copyright (C) 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004 Free Software
+# Foundation, Inc.
+#
+# This file is free software; the Free Software Foundation
+# gives unlimited permission to copy and/or distribute it,
+# with or without modifications, as long as this notice is preserved.
+
+dnl From Jim Meyering.
+dnl
+dnl See if the glibc *_unlocked I/O macros or functions are available.
+dnl Use only those *_unlocked macros or functions that are declared
+dnl (because some of them were declared in Solaris 2.5.1 but were removed
+dnl in Solaris 2.6, whereas we want binaries built on Solaris 2.5.1 to run
+dnl on Solaris 2.6).
+
+AC_DEFUN([gl_FUNC_GLIBC_UNLOCKED_IO],
+[
+  AC_DEFINE([USE_UNLOCKED_IO], 1,
+    [Define to 1 if you want getc etc. to use unlocked I/O if available.
+     Unlocked I/O can improve performance in unithreaded apps,
+     but it is not safe for multithreaded apps.])
+
+  dnl Persuade glibc and Solaris <stdio.h> to declare
+  dnl fgets_unlocked(), fputs_unlocked() etc.
+  AC_REQUIRE([gl_USE_SYSTEM_EXTENSIONS])
+
+  AC_CHECK_DECLS_ONCE(
+     [clearerr_unlocked feof_unlocked ferror_unlocked
+      fflush_unlocked fgets_unlocked fputc_unlocked fputs_unlocked
+      fread_unlocked fwrite_unlocked getc_unlocked
+      getchar_unlocked putc_unlocked putchar_unlocked])
+])